

| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Announced | 2025, April 29 2025, September 16 | |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Body | ||
| Weight | 232 g 190 g | |
| Thickness | 8.7mm thickness 8mm thickness | |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.8 x 8.7 mm 158.2 x 75 x 8 mm | |
| Build | Front glass, glass back, aluminum frame — | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.82 inches 6.57 inches | |
| Type | AMOLED AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels 1080 x 2372 pixels | |
| Protection | Armor glass DT-Star D+ | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite Mediatek Dimensity 7300 | |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 Android 15, ColorOS 15 | |
| CPU | Octa-core Octa-core | |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | |
| Card slot | No microSDXC | |
| Main Cameras | ||
|---|---|---|
| Main Cameras | ||
| Triple | 50 MP + 200 MP + 50 MP 50 MP, Auxiliary lens, Color spectrum sensor | |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import, Zeiss T* lens coating LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Selfie camera | ||
| Single | 50 MP 32 MP | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | ||
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W wired, 40W wireless 40W Wired | |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sound | ||
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers Yes, with stereo speakers | |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display), proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, Emergency SOS via satellite Fingerprint, gyro, proximity, compass, accelerometer | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Comms | ||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7 Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP 5.4, A2DP | |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GLONASS, QZSS | |
| Radio | No No | |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | |
Disclaimer We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more
A decision to opt either for the Vivo X200 Ultra or the Oppo F31 can be arrived at after weighing the features that each gadget offers against the requirements of a user. Both the phones are meant to serve people who require superior camera operations, usability, and energy consumption.
While the Vivo X200 Ultra is suitable for consumers who need an all-round performance with efficient picture handling capabilities and a prolonged battery power supply, the Oppo F31 is made for those who would wish to have a high-end design, superior camera resolution, and top-tier performance.
The display screen in the Vivo X200 Ultra smartphone measures 6.82 inches, LTPO AMOLED display that provides users with a vivid experience while using their smartphones. The display provides smooth scrolling, proper color accuracy, and a great viewing experience, which is ideal for such functions as watching videos, playing games, and browsing the web.
In comparison to the above device, the Oppo F31 smartphone features a 6.57 inches, AMOLED display that is brighter, sharper, and more responsive to provide users with an excellent experience, especially outdoors and when using their phone for long hours. Together with its robust build quality and ultra design, this phone can be regarded as a premium product.
The Vivo X200 Ultra and Oppo F31 come with smooth interface navigation and long-term software support, providing strong performance and a stable software experience for flagship users. The devices are capable of handling gaming, multitasking, and camera operations with ease, making them perfect for power users.
One of the main features differentiating these devices is battery capacity. The first device, Vivo X200 Ultra comes with a 6000 mAh battery. It allows for an extended period of device usage during tasks such as streaming, gaming, and multi-tasking. Therefore, it is an excellent choice for those who care more about battery life than anything else.
On the other hand, Oppo F31 has a 7000 mAh battery, which is specifically developed to work efficiently. Even though the battery capacity of this device is less compared to the first one, it can be used reliably due to optimized energy consumption.
While the Vivo X200 Ultra camera comes with a 200MP pixel count, which is efficient enough to take quality images with accurate colors and well-managed dynamic ranges, the software of the phone can help capture clear and bright photos in low lighting environments and portraits.
Conversely, the Oppo F31 has an impressive 50MP camera system that caters to ultra-high resolution photography. The camera system offers enhanced detail, accurate color representation, and diverse shooting options.
The Vivo X200 Ultra is packed with some of the best features in terms of performance, cameras, and battery life. The fact that it features 200MP cameras and 6000 mAh battery capacity means that it is one of the smartphones that can deliver good performance and even better cameras. This phone suits the user who cares about Fingerprint (under display), proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, Emergency SOS via satellite .
Alternatively, the Oppo F31 is known for its exceptional camera system with 50MP as well as the battery life of 7000 mAh , which is amazing. For people who like to have Fingerprint, gyro, proximity, compass, accelerometer , this phone will be perfect for them. Both phones are really good and unique in their own ways, and it comes down to personal preference.